382 beers listed
posted by dave in category
piss
(draft) During lunch in Cincinnatti today I looked over the sparse beer selection and chose to try Abita Amber since I'd never had it before. I chose poorly. Water with beer-flavoring added. The tap water taste overpowered the beer taste. Very unsatisfactory.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
fruit,
piss
(draft) A cloudy beer with a slightly pinkish tint. If it had any actual flavor I'd decribe it here, but alas, there was none. A waste of time.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
brown,
decent,
esb
(draft) Was described as an ESB by the bartender. Instead a fairly decent brown ale, with the lack of flavor characteristic (to me at least) of Abita beers. Was good enough to drink, but not good enough to have another.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
smoked,
yummy
(draft) Cloudy dark brown. Medium head. Delicious smoke aroma. Flavor was pretty good. Much more subdued than other Schlenkerla offerings. Maybe a little bacony, but this was surprisingly good. Yummy, in fact.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 206
posted by dave in category
smoked,
yummy
(draft) I was not expecting to like this. I don't know why. A nice clear dark amber color. The aroma of a smoky campfire. The smoke flavor is fairly apparent, and it's just smoke - no bacon or grapes or anything else to taint the flavor. I liked this a lot.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 372
posted by dave in category
decent,
smoked
(bottle) Well, the smoke was indeed very powerful. It was also quite a different type of smoky flavor than the Cone Smoker, Rogue Smoke Ale, or any other Rauchbier I've tried. I got a definite grapey taste from the smoke. I don't know if I would call it a good taste, but it certainly did the job of concealing the alcohol behind it.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 17
posted by dave in category
good,
smoked,
wheat
(bottle) The first thing I noticed was the fantastic aroma. The second thing I noticed was the color. Very dark - almost like a porter. Not what I was expecting from a weizen. The entire beer, in fact, was not what I was expecting. Instead of toning down the smoke to keep a fair balance with the light-flavored wheat, they left the smoke intact. The result was a smoke beer, with no hint at all of its wheat heritage. This is not to say that I didn't like it, because I did. I just didn't like it as much as I expected to.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 205
posted by dave in category
alt,
favorite,
yummy
My favorite session beer. Perfectly balanced sweetness, bitterness, and maltiness. Just the slightest kick of bitterness at the finish that makes me want another drink right away.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 2162
posted by dave in category
favorite,
porter,
smoked,
yummy
Just about as good as it gets. Dark and smoky. Not too bitter and not too sweet. This beer can be aged for years too, though I doubt that I'd ever have the discipline to do it. Absolutely yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 589
posted by dave in category
decent,
stout
(bottle) A decent head that faded very quickly. Aroma was mainly chocolate, with perhaps some cola as well. Flavor was a mix of coffee, chocolate, and cola, with maybe a touch of juniper. A decent and safe beer from one of my favorite breweries.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
good
(bottle) A nice copper color with a decent head. Starts out a little bitter but has a sweet finish and aftertaste. Works out to be very well-balanced. Another winner from Juneau.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 24
posted by dave in category
decent
(draft) Yes, Virginia, there is indeed such a thing as too much malt. This beer just needed something to balance it out. I don't know what it needed. It had nothing but malt. Seven different kinds according to the web page.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good,
weird
(bottle) Hazy brown. Minimal head. Aroma is complex and very strong, with malts and hops and nothing else. Flavor is mostly weird malts. Most quads feature dark fruit flavors, this is all malts. The two inches of sediment in the bottom of the bottle grossed me out. Overall, not bad, not great.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 22
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
belgian,
yummy
(bottle) Beautiful dark amber color. Fantastic malty and spicy aroma. Fizzy mouthfeel. Flavor of wheat and yeast and apple peels. Fucking yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 50
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good,
saison
(draft) Clear brownish-amber. No head worth noting. A nice clean aroma of apple peels and, of all things, bananas. Flavor was mild and smooth. Finish had a mild but lingering alcohol bite. Pretty good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
good,
weird
(draft) Clear dark copper in color. Good head. A delicious aroma of mals and oak and molasses. Syrupy mouthfeel. Flavor is mostly malt, with the slightest hints of dark fruits. Damn good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
lager,
swill
The citrusy smell and taste were just too much for me. It tasted like beer and orange juice mixed. Blech.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 3
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
good
I spent the entire pint trying to decide (a) if I liked it or not, and (b) what the heck I was drinking. Apparently Anchor changes the recipe for their Christmas Ale each year, and they keep that recipe pretty secret. If I had to guess I'd say the best way to describe this year's version would be "smoky nutmeg" but I could be way off base about the nutmeg part. There was definitely some smoky something in there. At the end I decided I did like it, but more than one in a given session would probably be too much.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 80
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
good
(draft) Much more malty than last year's version. Also a little bit of a chocolately feel to it. Not my favorite but still quite drinkable.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 40
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
good
(draft) Pretty damn good. Higly malty, with a touch of coffee. No chocolate or licorice at all, but still a good beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
good
(draft) Dark ruby in color, almost black. Nice head and very nice lacing. Fruity and spicy aroma. Fairly thin and highly-carbinated mouthfeel. Flavor of tingly dark cherries, a little sour even. Finish is tingly. Better than decent, barely good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
good,
porter
(bottle) Didn't get much of a head with this one. Strong roasted malt aroma. Flavor was biased a little more towards coffee than chocolate, but malty sweetness was the primary flavor. Pretty good, but not great.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
davefest,
scotch,
yummy
(draft) One of my favorites. I seemed to enjoy this more and more each time I had it. Probably the best Scotch Ale I've had. The flavor is hard to describe. I think that this one of those beers that you have to drink to understand just how good it is.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 100
posted by dave in category
decent
(draft) Roasty, malty, hoppy, weirdness. I'd like this more without the bitter finish.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 46
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
fruit,
swill
(draft) I had high hopes for this one. Blueberry flavor in a beer would definitely be something new and unusual for me. This actually ended up being my least favorite beer of the weekend. It tasted to me like an IPA. If there was any berry component to the flavor it was too subtle for me to detect it behind all the damn hops.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
decent,
porter
(draft) A fairly mild porter that smelled and tasted of bakers chocolate. No bitterness or coffee taste that I could detect, and I think that's a good thing.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
davefest,
good
(draft) I was sure I was enjoying a nice spiced ale but I see in the commercial description that the flavor is all malts. Very good, though a little sneaky as the alcohol doesn't really register. Anyone attempting to sample a wide range of beers cannot pass this up.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 50
posted by dave in category
brown,
good
(draft) Cloudy light brown. No head. Aroma of roasted malt. Fucking good. Another winner from Avery.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(bottle) Dark bronze. Nice firm head. I got a lot of dark fruity sweetness. I mean a lot. The very high (14.9%) ABV wasn't apparent except that I just knew that all that sweetness was covering up something dangerous. This is pretty much the opposite of a session beer. I liked it though.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 22
posted by dave in category
good,
stout
At 10% alcohol I knew this would be the only one of these I'd have. I liked the taste of this a lot. I detected a definite bourbon odor, and I asked if it was aged in an old bourbon barrel but the bartenders didn't think so. There wasn't really any bourbon to the taste so I may be insane.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 30
posted by dave in category
belgian,
yummy
Recommended to me because of my recent infatuation with belgian ales, this definitely did not disappoint. A nice reddish color and a decent head with a fair amount of lacing. For me, as with all belgians, the overwhelming flavor is that of apples. I can drink this in complete comfort. It's just yummy. Not quite as complex as a tripel I had a few weeks ago, but with a better overall flavor.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 432
posted by dave in category
brown,
good,
wheat
(draft) Very dark brown with a stupidly huge amount of foam. Aroma is malt and molasses. Flavor is more of the same. The alcohol is very well-hidden. A good beer, but not a great one. Needs more sizzle or something.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
brown,
decent,
homebrew
(bottle) Given to me by a homebrewing friend. No description or name given, it was all up to me. Pours a nice amber/honey color with lots of foam. The aroma is very sweet - almost too sweet - and that sweetness is quite evident in the taste as well. A good brown ale, but perhaps a little too cloying for me to ever spend an evening drinking it. Much better, of course, than anything I've ever made.
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
belgian,
decent
(bottle) Looked like grapefruit juice except for a huge white head. Citrusy aroma. Slight citrus flavor, but not so much that it became disgusting. Fizzy and other than that, a fairly mild flavor. Too many ingrediants in this beer, none stand out. It's a mish-mash.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 25
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
stout,
yummy
(draft) Lacing doesn't even begin to describe the foam that clung to my glass. A very nice stout - reminded me a lot of Murphy's. There was just a hint of chocolate, but nothing overpowering or pretentious at all. Yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 60
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(draft)Dark ruby-colored. Decent head. No aroma at all. The first sip was really digusting. It tasted like cherry cough syrup. The next several sip got gradually better, as other flavors became detectable. The end of the glass was halfway decent.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
decent
(draft) A nicely balanced ale that's probably getting a bit of an undeserved backlash for being so prevalent. With that said, it is a little boring. I'd drink this to drink, not for the flavor, which is decent but average.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
brown,
swill
(draft) Light copper. Good head, good lacing. Whoa. A strong malt and hop aroma, quite dry. Thin mouthfeel but still quite coating. Malt and hops predominate everything. Surprisingly bad.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
favorite,
porter,
yummy
(bottle) I was quite impressed by this. An aroma that I can only describe as chocolately-grapey. A flavor that stayed with me from the time my lips touched it to the time I swallowed - in other words, consistently good. Quite yummy. I wish I'd had another one.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 374
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
good,
stout
(can) Nice and creamy, though that could have been because of the widget. Compared to Guinness, a little sweeter, with a a subtle chocolate flavor instead of coffee. I liked it, and would probably like it more if I can ever find it on tap.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
decent,
scotch
(can) Very creamy and smooth. This beer had a lot of stuff floating in it, and by the time I got to the last inch or so of the glass it was grossing me out so I stopped drinking it.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 14
posted by dave in category
decent,
esb
(bottle) Nobody else has said it, so I will. This beer had a greenish tint to it. There, I've said it. Aside from the odd coloring, this was a pretty decent beer. The bar had it listed as a smoked beer, so I was a little disappointed to find an ESB instead, but it was quite decent. Actually reminded me more of a Alt than an ESB.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
decent,
ipa
(draft) Very I'd never have guessed that this was an IPA. The aroma was mostly of malt and dirt, but good. Flavor was a little peaty and a little smoky. I liked it a lot more than I expected to.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
decent,
scotch
(draft) This was decent, but there was just something strange about it. Some fruity characteristic that I couldn't identify. There was also a bitterness that came out of nowhere at the finish.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
decent
(bottle) Very intense aroma as soon as the cap was removed. No head to speak of. After the first few sips that were nothing but alcohol burn, the rest of this went down quite nicely. Too much coffee and too little chocolate for it to ever be a real favorite. I got some cola from this too, especially in the aroma.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 24
posted by dave in category
brown,
decent
(draft) Just a decent fairly generic brown ale. More sweet than most I suppose, and not malty-sweet but sugar-sweet. If that makes any sense.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 60
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
good
(draft) No aroma whatsoever. The first couple of sips reminded me more of cranberries than cherries. About halfway thourgh the glass I decided that it wasn't too bad and ordered another pint. A little sour, a little sweet. Really quite drinkable though.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 100
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(draft) Black, with a decent brown head. A sugary sweet aroma. Flavor was fairly intense, with spices and a slight hint of coffee. Pretty damn good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
davefest,
stout,
yummy
(draft) Oh, Bell's Kalamazoo Stout, where have you been all my life? This is as close to the perfect stout as I've ever had. All of the flavor of an imperial, but without the high ABV and without the alcohol burn. My new favorite non-chocolate stout in the entire world. Yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 530
posted by dave in category
swill
(draft) Bright and fizzy. This would probably be good if it was a hot enough day. Like a million degrees or something.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
good,
porter
(draft) Not a thing wrong with this beer. That's the first thing I thought of. No aroma to speak of, a mild chocolate flavor that was quite yummy. No bitterness at all. An excellent session porter.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 64
posted by dave in category
belgian,
yummy
(draft) Smells like old socks. Looks like a lager. Tastes fantastic. Reminds me of the winter ales from the established Belgian breweries. Apples and other, unidentifiable, fruits predominate. A very surprising beer from one of my favorite breweries. Yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
good,
rye,
stout
(draft) I found this to be a basic stout with a slight chocolate flavor and a touch of rye bitterness at the finish. I liked it a lot, and I will probably go try to find it in bottles.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
good
(draft) A nice roasty chocolate flavor. The extra alcohol, as compared to similar stouts, seemed unnecessary to me, and annoyed me a little. A beer this good doesn't need the alcohol gimmick.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 80
posted by dave in category
swill
(draft) This seems to be a favorite, but I just don't get it. The smell of old socks was just too much for me. I couldn't finish the glass.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 8
posted by dave in category
swill
I didn't like this even a little bit. Bitter with strange, undefinable undertones. I barely finished the glass.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
fruit,
swill
(draft) This might have been sweet and syupy or it might have been all the blueberries floating up and down. I couldn't finish the glass. Those things hitting my lips were just too strange.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
brown,
good
(draft) A nice malty brown ale. Very pretty lacing. There was a bit of a coffee overtone that I could have done without. Quite good though.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
good,
stout
(draft) Pretty good. A slight coffee taste. A slightly bitter finish. More roasted malt flavor than I'm used to in this style, and I think that's what saved it for me.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
wheat,
yummy
(draft) A very cloudy yellow beer. Strong banana aroma. Came with a citrus wedge that I seem to have removed before it ruined the flavor. Quite yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 24
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
brown,
decent,
fruit
(draft) A light brown ale (think Newcastle) with a wedge of watermelon in it. Once I removed the offending fruit I couldn't detect anything noteworthy. Maybe a bit of a hoppy finish.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
good,
wheat
(draft) Served in a glass that was way too cold. There were ice crystals in the beer. Once it had thawed out a little, this was a pretty good beer. Very much a German-style wheat, but with the tiniest little bite of hops in the finish. I liked it.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
good,
porter
(draft) Very nice. Chocolately and roasty and malty. If this was available near my home it would be one of my favorite beers.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
piss
(draft) No head. No aroma, No flavor. A very dry and fizzy mouthfeel. Probably good for an upset stomach but little else.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good,
wheat
A commonly-available beer that I put off drinking simply because of its availability - reasoning that something so widely accepted must be bland and boring. I was quite wrong (see Newcastle for another example of my flawed logic). This is a very nice beer that went down very easily. I think I could drink it all night, and that's not something I could say about most Belgians.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 555
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
good
(bottle) Clear bronze. Good head and lacing. I got hints of several spices and unusual flavors, most notably of vanilla. Very easy to drink. Very good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 132
posted by dave in category
alt,
good
(draft) That nice copper color was a welcome sight to an old altbier drinker. This beer has a pretty good balance - maybe a little on the bitter side. I also think it's changed a little for the worse since the brewery split apart several months ago.
update 080605: I've had this several times in both bottled and draft form. The bottled form tastes better to me. Go figure.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 368
posted by dave in category
barleywine,
decent
This was my first taste of a barleywine, and I suppose it was okay. Just imagine regular wine without any grapey taste, and add a hint of hops. That's what this tasted like. It was okay, but I cannot imagine having more than one in an evening.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
porter,
yummy
(draft) This beer that I didn't care for a year ago has either been changed or (more likely) my own tastes have changed. I found this to be a very good porter, even with the slight bitterness to the finish.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 288
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(draft) Dark amber in color. Good head and lacing. Smells like malts and dark fruits. Tastes like malts and overripe charries. Good though.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good,
weird
(draft) Clear dark bronze. Decent head. No detectable aroma. Flavor of dried cherries. The finish was quite drying as well. A good beer, but weird.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
bourbon,
good
(draft) A very dark red. Bourbon aroma is very faint - almost not noticeable. The flavor is that of a very mild stout with only the slightest hint of bourbon showing up in the finish. Not too bad. Quite good actually.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 478
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(bottle) No foam at all. I mean none. I've seen tap water with a bigger head. Other than that, poured a slightly hazy orange. Taste was, as expected, fairly flat and generic. Yeasty and bland in flavor, this beer did grow on me as time went by. I'd love to try this in draft form someday. Maybe there'll be some fizz then.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 50
posted by dave in category
brown,
good
(draft) Almost identical to Fat Tire ale. Malty and a little chocolately. In other words, very drinkable. More of a session beer than anything else. I recommend this highly.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 70
posted by dave in category
good,
porter,
smoked
(draft) The first time I saw this, they were calling it "Smokey the Beer." What a stupid name. This beer tasted terrible for the first few ounces, then once my palate had been numbed enough, it tasted pretty damn good. A lot like their regular, nonsmoked porter. It's probably the same beer. Just a touch
of smoked malt, a little chocolate. I liked it.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 34
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good,
wheat
(draft) Hazy yellow, with tons of foam. This beer is advertised as a spiced Belgian wheat. I didn't get any spices though. I got yeast and bananas and wheat, all more apparent in the aroma than in the flavor. It's a good and neutral example of the style to me. I liked it.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
piss
I'd heard some good things about this, but I can't for the life of me figure out why. This was water with a couple of drops of beer flavoring added. I only drank about an inch from the glass.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 2
posted by dave in category
stout,
swill
(draft) I think there was something wrong with this beer. It actually tasted skunked. I hope it didn't taste this way on purpose.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
good,
stout
(draft) Black with a large tan head. Fantastic chocolate and malt aroma. The flavor is chocolately and roasty. Very roasty. I'm not even sure that's a word, but I'm using it anyway. Pretty damn good. The 10.6% ABV is very well hidden.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
brown,
good
(draft) Almost with a decent tan head. Aroma of malts, and not much else. Same for the flavor. No bitterness. I liked it.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 80
posted by dave in category
barleywine,
swill
(bottle) Clear medium-dark amber. No head, some fizz. Aroma of malt and dried hops. Flavor of burnt malt and stale hops. Quite fucking disgusting. I only took a few sips before giving up. LIfe's too short to waste drinking beer like this.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
good,
scotch
(bottle) Clear dark amber. Minimal head. Aroma of hops and malts. Flavor pretty good. Mostly malty sweetness with a touch of grass or something like that. A touch of hoppiness at the end that didn't gross me out.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
bourbon,
stout,
yummy
(draft) Black. Large brown head with great lacing. A nice chocolately flavor behind the bourbon, which shows up mainly in the lingering finish. Pretty damn yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 156
posted by dave in category
swill
(draft) Way too bitter for my tastes, but I suppose some people like the bitterness.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
brown,
decent
Watery, but drinkable. The most (and perhaps only) enjoyable beer I've had at Brownings.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 64
posted by dave in category
lager,
piss
Clear pale yellow. Fizzy and a little sharp. Pretty gross.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 324
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
piss,
wheat
(draft) Lord, why hast thou foresaken me? I thought this was crap. I only drank about two sips and then I threw the rest away.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 2
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent,
lambic
(bottle) Don't know what vintage this was. Incredibly sour taste. Like sucking on lemon rinds. Not musty or funky at all. Drinkable, but not noteworthy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
belgian,
lambic,
yummy
(bottle, 2002 vintage) Like a regular, somewhat mild, Belgian strained through dirty sweat socks. This is what I was expecting from a lambic festival! A little sour, a little drying, a lot tasty.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good,
lambic
(bottle) Funky and Musty. Very dry finish. Hard to pin down exactly what this tasted like. I liked it.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
brown,
yummy
(draft) I've rated this a little higher than most brown ales because there was something special about it. I don't know what, though. There was a slightly spicy aroma and flavor. Whatever it was, it was damn good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 24
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(draft) A nice beer. Not nearly as sweet as other tripels I've have. I got a subtle undertone that reminded me of smoke. There was very little head, though this may have been caused by the filthy glass. I liked it a lot, but there are a zillion better Belgians out there.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(bottle) Dark amber. Decent head with lots of fizz. The cork nearly took my eye out when it popped. A nice sharp and fruity aroma. Maybe some floral scent in there too. Flavor more of the same, with maybe an added touch of cola. The sediment at the bottom of the bottle grossed me out.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(draft 2002 vintage) A nice reddish-brown. Had a fruit component that wasn't the apples I'm used to from Belgians. I'm going to call the flavor a mix of cherries and beets. Not too bad, but not worth a second glass.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
good
(draft) Poured a lot darker than I expected. A pretty good beer. No spices or adjuncts that I could detect, so I'm not sure that I agree with the "Winter Beer" classification. Good though.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
good,
saison
(draft) Wow! Unexpectedly good. Extremely well-balanced and very refreshing. It also tasted like it had a higher ABV than it really does.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
decent,
stout
(draft) Black with cream-colored head and incredible lacing. Flavor slanted a bit more towards coffee than chocolate. A decent beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(draft) Dark clear copper. Good head. Smelled like a barleywine, and pretty much tasted like one too. That weird flavor of beets or prunes or whatever it is - I don't like it. This beer did grow on me a little as the glass got more empty, but I still can't really say that I liked it.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
belgian,
yummy
(draft) Smelled better than it tasted, but it smelled fantastic. Nice and malty with some spice aroma that I couldn't identify. Taste was very similar to the Great Lakes Christmas Ale - if you like that, you'll like this.
UPDAYE 111805: Not similar at all to the Great Lakes brew. Still delicious though. Sweet and complex, I got a little bit of cola flavor that I hadn't noticed before. Too strong for more than one in a night, and that sucks.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 80
posted by dave in category
belgian,
brown,
swill
I thought this beer smelled and looked fantastic. I'm not really sure what I was expecting tastewise - I suppose a combination of a Belgian and a Brown. What I got was a strange-tasting beer that I can't really say I liked all that much. It just tasted like something was wrong with it, but I couldn't point to any one thing.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
porter,
yummy
(draft) Took a long time to pour, but worth the wait. Very smooth. Nice chocolate aroma and flavor that reminded me of Young's Double Chocolate Stout. This is a very good beer. Yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 200
posted by dave in category
brown,
good
(draft) Another winner from this small brewpub. Quite malty and nutty, but enough hops to keep it nicely balanced.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
fruit,
good,
stout
(draft) A stout, not just an ale, which was news to me. I didn't get much of an aroma from this, and the blueberry flavor was more subtle that I was expecting. The blueberries showed up mostly in the finish, which had absolutely no trace of bitterness. The undertones were mostly roasted malt, and the flavor slanted a tad more towards coffee than chocolate. A very good beer, worth the wait.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 138
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(draft) Absolutely nothing special about this beer except that it's an Abbey Tripel, so it's special by default. Very good, but not great.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
chocolate,
experiment,
good
(mixture) I mixed Bell's Cherry Ale and Young's Double Chocolate Stout in a 1-to-1 ratio. Just a fantastic combination. A nice deep red color. Chocolate flavor that's followed by a slightly sour finish. I'd definitely buy this if it was available commercially. Yummy.
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
experiment,
yummy
(mixture) I mixed 1/2 Bells Cherry Ale with 1/2 BBC Dark Star Porter, and ended up with something greater than the sum of its parts. The too bitter porter balanced very nicely with the too sweet/sour Bells, and it was just excellent. I, apparently, am a frickin' genius.
Ounces Consumed: 60
(mixture) I mixed 1/2 NABC Tunnel Vision with 1/2 Rogue Smoke Ale. For whatever reason, I figured that the honey sweetness of the Tunnel Vision and the smoky bitterness of the Rogue Smoke would play off each other quite well. I was right. I would drink the stuff if it was available commercially.
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
smoked,
wheat,
yummy
(mixture) I mixed Weihenstephaner Hefeweissbier and Spezial Rauchbier on a 1:1 ratio. Amazing head, courtesy of the Weihenstephaner. Aroma of bananas and cloves, slightly subdued. Flavor of a German wheat beer. The smoke shows up in the finish. Yummy. I'm a freakin' genius.
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
belgian,
experiment,
wheat,
yummy
(mixture) I mixed Weihenstephaner Hefeweissbier and Delirium Tremens in the 16.9:11.2 ratio dictated to me by the bottle sizes. Mixing what are perhaps the ultimate representations of German wheat and Belgian strong ales, I'm not quite sure what I was expecting to accomplish. One thing that I definitely wasn't expecting was to create a beer that would make me believe in God. Well, so much for expectations. Way beyond yummy.
Ounces Consumed: 28
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(bottle) Pouring this into a glass resulted in about a 5/1 head/beer ratio. I actually lost patience waiting for the head to dissipate and ended up disrupting it with my finger. Once I got to the actual beer I really enjoyed it. A little lighter in both flavor and ABV than other Belgians I've enjoyed, so more suitable as a session beer. Black flecks that settled to the bottom of my glass turned me off a little.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 11
posted by dave in category
belgian,
swill
(bottle) Fizzy, hazy orange. Citrus undertones that I didn't care for at all. MIght be okay on a hot Summer day. My least favorite from this otherwise wonderful brewery.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
belgian,
davefest,
yummy
Cloudy yellow with a head that lasted throughout the glass. A great belgian beer. Well carbonated and fairly thick-tasting. This was as close to drinking hard cider as I think I could stand. I liked this beer a lot, but at a whopping 10% alcohol I know that one will always be my limit. One of my all-time favorites.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 284
posted by dave in category
belgian,
swill
(bottle) Highly recommended by several people, but I'm not really sure why. I've never had cherry wine, but I'm convinced that I now know what it would taste like. Very sweet, very winey. No bitterness to balance the sweetness at all. Not very good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent,
stout
(draft) Fizzy, which was quite a strange sensation coming from a stout. More coffee than chocolate flavored, so not my favorite even once the fizz had faded.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(bottle/draft) Poured an orange/red color, with the massive head I usually find in De Dolle beers. Aroma much more massive and much more complex than their other offerings. Along with the standard Belgian apple tones, I also got what I'll call cherries and apricots. Did not taste like it had 12% alcohol in it. A little sour in the finish.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 66
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(draft) A nice cloudy copper color that was quite intriguing. Nothing particularly special about the taste - actually this beer seemed a little too well-balanced. All of the flavors seemed to cancel each other out.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(draft) The hop aroma was very evident and I was surprised to find such a tame flavor behind it. This is a beer I could drink all night, but I wouldn't want to because it's pretty boring.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 40
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(bottle) Very dark, very fruity aroma. Taste reminded me of cherry wine. The second half of my glass - once the head had dissipated - was much better than the first half.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 72
posted by dave in category
belgian,
yummy
(draft) Dark brownish red with a very dense head that lasted forever. A very nice completion to the Delirium triad. Not as much spice as I was perhaps expecting, but very drinkable. More similar to Delirium Nocturnum than to Tremens. Yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 80
posted by dave in category
belgian,
davefest,
favorite,
yummy
(draft) My desert island beer. I only wish I could drink more than a couple without going into a coma. The ultimate Belgian as far as I'm concerned. If you don't like this beer, then I don't like you.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 1008
posted by dave in category
good,
porter
(bottle) Cola color. Roaster malt and caramel aroma. Fairly thin mouthfeel. The flavor was of cola and caramel. Slightly dry finish.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
fruit,
good
(draft) Clear bronze. A thin tan head that faded quickly and left nice lacing behind. Besides the unusual (for me) pumpkin flavor, there was a strange bitterness that came and went before the finish. Once my tastebuds had become numb to the bitterness this was a pretty good beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good,
lambic
(bottle, 1999 vintage) Less sour than other lambics, but much more of a dry finish. A subtle hint of funkiness in both the aroma and flavor. Pretty damn good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(bottle) Cloudy brown with minimal head. Very strong flavor, bordering on the ridiculous. Almost sour, almost overpowering cherry flavor. I didn't finish the bottle. Probably not worth having again unless I can try it on tap.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(bottle) Slightly hazy orange. Quite fizzy in both aroma and flavor. Hints of apples, expected for the style, but the fizz was the predominate characteristic. Reminiscent of champagne. Good, but not great.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
decent
(draft) Had a strange flavor that I've never been able to accurately describe in this type of beer. Very thick, almost syrupy mouthfeel. The alcohol was quite evident.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
decent,
wheat
(bottle) Hazy amber in color. Strong cloves and banana aroma. Medium-thin mouthfeel. A decent flavor but there's a splash of orangey citrus that I could do without.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 17
posted by dave in category
good
(draft) Not what I was expecting, but a pleasant surprise instead. The main flavor I got was caramel, but there was really an awful lot of complexity behind that. Everything was subdued, but noticeable. Pretty good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 90
posted by dave in category
lager,
swill
(can) It wasn't the battery acid that I remember from the occasional sips I took as a kid. As lagers go, it's probably better than most American ones. That's not saying much though. Hoppy, with a little bit of a citrus tang that didn't make me want to vomit. Not after just one at least. I didn't risk another.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 36
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
belgian,
decent
I was expecting something different, and perhaps even better, from this beer. What I got was, to me anyway, a bland, somewhat dirty tasting belgian. I certainly don't understand the hype.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
good,
saison
The beer that got me to finally appreciate Belgian brews. Apples were strong but not overpowering.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 60
posted by dave in category
brown,
good
(bottle) A pretty good and mild beer that always seems to go off like a bomb a few hours after I drink it. I do like it though, so I still have one every now and then.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 50
posted by dave in category
decent,
porter
(draft) Looks nice, with good lacing. A fairly intense coffee/licorice flavor that didn't appeal to me very much. The high alcohol is fairly apparent. The second half of the glass tasted better to my numbed taste buds than the first half had.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
yummy
(draft) A mild aroma and flavor. There was a hint of spice at the finish. Quite interesting. I liked it. A Winter Ale that's almost low enough in alcohol to be a session beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 44
posted by dave in category
decent,
rye,
stout
(bottle) You know, I wasn?t really expecting to like this. Most ryes are just too strange for me. But this one was actually pretty decent. There was nothing notable about it though, so I probably won?t bother to have it again.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
piss
(draft) This really sucked.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
good
(draft) This beer knocked me on my ass. Very dark red, nearly black, with a decent head and more lacing than I expected. The flavor was a little intense. I kept wanting to call this a Winter warmer without the Winter part. A beer to celebrate happiness or drown sorrows, not a beer to simply enjoy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 30
posted by dave in category
good,
rye
(draft) The first sip of this was just disgusting, but I vowed to drink a couple of inches to give it a fair test. At about halfway through the pint I decide I sorta liked it. By the end of the pint I wanted another one. An odd-tasting beer that just grew on me. Not sure I can describe the taste.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 124
posted by dave in category
decent,
lager
(bottle) A fairly standard lager. Not as fizzy as some, but not as flavorful either. Nothing special.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 2
posted by dave in category
brown,
decent
(bottle) Dirty brown with an awful lot of yeast cloudiness. Aroma was faint, as was the flavor. Caramel seemed to prediminate. Not too bad. Might be better in draft form.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 11
posted by dave in category
brown,
swill
(draft) Smelled and tasted like an Alt, even though it's supposed to be an English Stong Ale. The only non-Altish characteristic was that the aftertaste was quite bitter - too bitter for my tastes.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
swill,
wheat
(draft) Take a light american wheat and spray lemon pledge in it. Not the worst thing I've ever tasted, but far from the best.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
good
(draft) Had this a year ago and didn't see anything special about it. Had it again last night and really liked it a lot. I thought I detected roasted nutmeg but don't see that mentioned anywhere. Very much a Winter ale, and very much a good one.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 140
posted by dave in category
brown,
decent
(draft) I know I've had this before, but it was a long time ago. I'm not sure if "roasty" is a word, but it should be because it would be the perfect word to describe this beer. Not bad, but not great.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
davefest,
esb,
good
(draft) A great beer for starting out an evening, yet interesting enough to make an entire session out of it. Smooth and malty. Tastes like it should have a higher ABV.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 94
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(draft) Dark yellow. No head. Minimal lacing. No aroma. Flavor of dark fruits and malts. Pretty damn good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
decent
(draft) Highly recommended by all who'd had it at Rich O's. Definitely a Christmas Ale - all sorts of complex flavors. I thought the fruitiness was a little bit too much but I suppose it was needed to mask all of that alcohol.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 40
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(bottle) Looks like a lager, and smells like a lager. Flavor is decent. A little stale, and a little musty. I'm thinking that the bottle may have gone bad. I only drank a little, and threw the rest away.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
decent,
porter
(draft) I guess this place has gone out of business. Hmmm, I wonder how long this beer has been sitting in the keg. The first thing I noticed was that it was quite thin. Like water. It took me a long time to figure out how to describe the flavor. That's because there was nothing. It was all roasted malt. I think I'd have liked this better if it wasn't so old-tasting.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 24
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
good,
stout
(draft) I've never been a big fan of oak aged brews, but the oak undertones of this are subtle enough that they're hardly noticeable. Just enough chocolate and coffee flavor to almost mask the alcohol burn, but not quite. Pretty good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
swill
(draft) This beer was simply hard to drink. Part of the problem was that it really clashed with the beer I'd just finished, but most of the problem was that it tasted like cranberry juice. It did get better towards the end of the glass.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
belgian,
yummy
They may call it an "Abbey Tripel" but to me this is a Belgian Ale, and it had all of the appleness that I've come to expect from Belgians, but this beer had a lot of other characteristics that I cannot even begin to describe. It was one of the most complex beers I've ever had. Yummy.
Update 080605: Yes, I am now aware that an Abbey Tripel is a type of Belgian Ale.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 70
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
yummy
Another winner from this excellent brewery. Very complex but well balanced. Starts out sweet, with a complicated blend of spices that I won't try to describe, followed by a surprising bit of cinnamon heat at the end. Nothing overpowering. Yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 120
posted by dave in category
porter,
yummy
(bottle) One of the best porters I can remember having. Understated notes of coffee and chocolate. Roasty and yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 256
posted by dave in category
brown,
decent
(draft) No aroma to speak of. the taste and the mouthfeel reminded me of a dopplebock more than anything else. Not worth a full glass.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good,
wheat
(draft) Smells and tastes more like a German than a Belgian wheat. As a German, it's quite good. As a Belgian, it's a little musty.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
decent,
wheat
(draft) Almost overpowering aroma. Flavor was good, but much more subdued than the aroma had hinted. The head disappeared almost immediately. Zero fizz.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
good,
scotch
(draft) Creamy and malty. Very good, and I ended up having a second one. The best lacing I've seen in a long time.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
brown,
decent
(draft) A nice spicy aroma that led to a fairly tame-tasting beer. There was a slight mustiness to it that didn't exactly thrill me. By the second half of the glass the head had dissipated so both the spice and the must had gone. What was left was good but not great.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
good,
stout
(draft) There's nothing new that I can say about Guinness. It's one of my favorites. Beautiful head, gorgeous lacing, nice malty aroma. A touch of coffee taste that I could actually do without.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 1464
posted by dave in category
belgian,
yummy
(draft) Not at all what I was expecting. This seems more like a Christmas ale than anythng else. I got a lot of fruit that I'll call raspberry. A yummy beer. The high ABV is very well hidden - a little too well perhaps.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 293
posted by dave in category
decent,
porter
(draft) Almost black. Good head, good lacing. A very faint coffe and hop aroma. There was a slight bitterness to the flavor and the finish. Not worth my time. Just barely decent.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
belgian,
lambic,
piss
(bottle) I kind of expected that this mead/lambic blend would be disgusting. I was right. Probably the nastiest thing that's touched my tongue in years.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 7
posted by dave in category
decent,
lager
(draft) Probably my favorite lager, which still isn't saying much. Any place serving this will probably have something better to offer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 48
posted by dave in category
smoked,
swill
(draft) I told the drunk next to me (he had asked) that I predicted that this would be my favorite beer of the night. I was wrong. The smoke was reminiscent of bacon, or perhaps beef jerky. Probably the only smoked beer that I've ever had that I didn't like.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
good,
wheat
(bottle) Despite the name Hefeweizen, this is an American wheat beer. Despite that, I liked it anyway. There was none of the hop bitterness that I usually associate with this style. The thing tasted like a Belgian wheat, and it tasted good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
favorite,
yummy
The web page says cinnamon and nutmeg. I got none of that. What I got was ambrosia. The most unusual beer I've ever had, and it took me a while to pin down what I was experiencing. Copper colored, good lacing, and an actual flower aroma. The flavor was incredibly indescribable, but I'll try anyway. Take a beautiful woman, have her bathe in lilacs and Mr. Bubble. Now perform oral sex on her. That's how good this beer was.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 100
posted by dave in category
good,
porter
(draft) Black in color. Decent white head. Roasty cola aroma. Very well-balanced between coffee and chocolate. Pretty damn good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
good,
weird
(draft) The first few sips, understandably, brought to mind a beer with ginger ale poured into it. By the end of the glass I'd decided that I did like this beer, and that I wished that it was even a little stranger than it was. Very unusual, and very drinkable.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 40
posted by dave in category
piss
Rotten molasses is how I will describe it, though I don't really know what rotten molasses tastes like.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
davefest,
good,
rice,
weird
(draft) Tastes like a pilsner until you swallow, that's when the funkiness takes over. I guess the funkiness was due to the sake yeasts used on the rice. My enjoyment of this beer grew with each sip, and I missed it when it was gone.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 100
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent,
wheat
(bottle) Recommended to me because I asked for something with a lighter taste. A cloudy yellow color that looked to me like a cross between a wheat and a lager - neither of which I care for. The taste was actually pretty decent though. The bartender was telling me about all of these different flavor components but I didn't really get any of them. Just a fairly plain, safe beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 44
posted by dave in category
decent
(draft) Not a thing wrong with this beer. Not a thing noteworthy about it either. A little nutty, a little malty, a little tasty. Not my favorite style, but one of my favorites in this style.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
good,
wheat
(draft) There aren't many hefeweizens that I can say I actually liked. This one I liked. Sweet and fruity, with none of the citrus that usually ruins this style for me. Yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 40
posted by dave in category
brown,
swill
(draft) Orange. Some faint apple flavor, but even more apricots. A little too sweet and citrusy for my tastes.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
esb,
swill
Had an applely taste that I didn't find disgusting but I didn't like it enough to have a full pint. I'm surprised to see this classified as an ESB.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(bottle) Smelled fantastic. The first sip was actually a little bit disgusting. I wasn't expecting fizzy citrus. Having said that, however, I did finish the glass, and then another one, and then the rest of the bottle, so I couldn't have hated it that much. Probably not worth having again though.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 25
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
good,
porter
(draft) Smelled like snot, but that might have been because I was developing a cold. Served too warm for my tastes, and I almost never say that. A very creamy and smooth chocolatey porter. It contains more alcohol than I'd have guessed. I'd like to try this again once they get the cooler fixed.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(draft) Hazy dark ruby-colored. Minimal head. Mild fruity aroma. A smooth and creamy mouthfel and flavor, with a hint of an alcohol bite at the end. Damn good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
good
(bottle) Zero carbonation. Zero fizz. This lack of head reminded me of every NABC beer ever made. It was a very nice copper color, and it had a very nice and sweet flavor. I'd love to try this in draft form someday, but I don't really expect that to happen. This would get a yummy rating except for its flatness.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 11
posted by dave in category
bourbon,
decent,
weird
(draft) Clear amber in color. No head to speak of. Very strong aroma of coconuts, of all things. Mouthfeel was fairly thin. Coconut predominates the flavor, just like it does the aroma. Smells like suntan lotion,a nd tastes like what I imagine suntan lotion tastes like. After an inch or so was gone, this started to taste a little better. What was strange was that I got absolutely zero indication of this beer's alleged bourbon influence.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
lager,
piss
(draft) Nowhere on the tap did it have the word lager. That's false advertising as far as I'm concerned, but so is the lack of the phrase watery baby bunny piss. This just might give a Stella a run for its money as the weakest non-American lager in the world.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 6
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(bottle) Hazy dark brown. Minimal head. Fantastic fruity aroma. Flavor is sharp, with dark fruits domating. Quite good, but not as refined or as well balanced as the quad.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 25
posted by dave in category
belgian,
favorite,
yummy
Cloudy dark red. An intense fruit aroma, with a mixture of dark cherries and apples and citrus. Easily one of the best beers I've ever had. Fucking yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 508
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(bottle) Hazy dark gold, smallish head, some lacing. A nice clean aroma. The flavor is not too bad. A little musty for some reason. Given a choice between this and the quad, you should always take the quad. Always.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 31
posted by dave in category
lager,
piss
(draft) An absolutely terrible, bland, watery excuse for a beer. Tastes exactly how it looks - weak and boring.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 1
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(draft) A fairly standard tasting tripel. Perhaps a little more citrus than I'd prefer, but very drinkable.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 30
posted by dave in category
belgian,
yummy
(draft) Looks like a lager, so scary. Smells like unpeeled apples. OMG tastes fantastic! I may just cream. Fucking yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
decent,
stout
(draft) Not much to say about this beer. Nothing stood out at all. A little thinner than I was expecting. No coffee, no chocolate, no licorice. Just a bit of a milky feel to it. I guess that's why they call it Milk Stout.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
porter,
smoked,
yummy
(bottle) Almost completely black. Huge heaping head. Heavenly smoked malt aroma. From under the massive layer of foam, some chocolate notes rose and made themselves known. The mouthfeel is a lot thinner than I was expecting. Flavor is intensely sweet. Some smoke in the finish. After the first few sips, I became numb to the sweetness, and the overall balance of the beer became evident. Quite yummy.
Left Hand Smoke Jumper
Ounces Consumed: 50
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
weird,
yummy
(draft) Clear dark copper in color. Good head and lacing. Strong spice and malt aroma and flavor. Mouthfeel seemed a little watery at first, but it seemed to thicken as the glass emptied. Flavor is nutmeg and cinnamon and a touch of citrus. A lingering slightly hoppy finish. A yummy beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 92
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent,
ipa
(draft) Cloudy gold, huge heaping head. A mild yeast and citrus aroma. Flavor was acidic with oranges and hops. Not bad, not good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
brown,
yummy
This beer is quite simply excellent. Brewed and sold only in the Northwest, it's exemplifying a level of quality and taste that all microbreweries should strive to meet instead of just churning out random recipies with unusual labels.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 48
posted by dave in category
decent
(draft) I've never been a big fan of bock beers. I'm still not. I spent quite a bit of time trying to come up with a way to describe this beer. I detected coffee, chocolate, malt, and hops, all in miniscule amounts. There were no citrus components to the taste and for that I was grateful.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
belgian,
yummy
(bottle) Hazy gold with lots of fizz. Good-sized head. Aroma fairly standard for Belgian ales. Flavor quite yummy. The usual for this style, but with some tiny hints of spices and maybe even some caramel in there.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
belgian,
davefest,
sour,
weird
(draft) Dark red, and sour. The first sip pretty much tells the whol story of this beer. I recommend it to anyone wanting to try something different, and almost everyone who's tried it has liked it a lot.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 115
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good,
sour
(draft) Clear ruby-brown in color. A nice fluffy head. Sour charries and apples in both the aroma and the flavor. Very comparable to Metreechs. Quite good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent,
wheat
(draft) I asked them to leave the orange wedge out, but I needn't have bothered. This beer was overflowing with citrus aroma and flavor. I should have known better than to even try it. Anyway, it was decent, which is better than anything else I've had from this place.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
swill
(draft) Quite disgusting. Has that tingly mouthfeel that I detest in lagers. I was suurprised to find in this, ostensibly an ale. This is a beer trying to appeal to the swill drinking masses and the good beer drinkers at the same time. It fails at both.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
stout,
swill
(draft) Very thin flavor and mouthfeel. Definitely drinkable, but so is water.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
decent
Quite boring and generic. No hint at all of the strangeness that I usually associate with this style. I see no point to even making this beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
swill,
wheat
The bartender didn't know if it was a German-style or and American-style wheat, so I just had a sampler glass. It's American-style, so I didn't like it. The honey was not apparent except that the usual hop bitterness I find in this style was not there. Bland and boring.
website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
stout,
yummy
Fucking yummy and chocolately and yummy. Whoever says that there's no good beer at Laclede's Landing is an idiot. This beer was worth the trip all by itself.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 32
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
bourbon,
stout,
yummy
Despite the name, this is an oatmeal stout aged in used Jack Daniel's barrels. The bartender says that every beer in the place is "lager-style" which to me means yeast. Whatever they call it, this beer is yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 36
posted by dave in category
brown,
swill
(draft) After being lured in by the color and the overflowing foam, I ended up thinking that this beer was all show. Not much of a taste at all, just a faint aftertaste of bitterness.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
brown,
weird,
yummy
(draft) Clear brown. Zero fizz. Smells like a pine tree - must be the mugwort. The flavor is very weird, and very good. I like this a lot. Tastes like it should have more alcohol than it does.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 320
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
This is what I've been waiting for! A Belgian that won't kill me if I have more than one in a night! Very good, it reminded me of NABC's Tunnel Vision except not quite as sweet. Could use a little more carbonation, and it lacks the appley taste I've become accustomed to from Belgians. I liked it a lot, and I'm looking forward to the next batch to see if they up the carbonation a little.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 110
posted by dave in category
decent,
esb
For a beer with the word "bitter" in the name it wasn't bad at all. A lot darker and more complex than I expected.
Update 060805: I've had a couple new incarnations of this since my original entry. I've vowed that this will never touch my lips again. The bitterness I've experience with my last few attempts is just unbearable.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 80
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
bourbon,
porter,
yummy
(draft) Wow! The regular Bob's 15B is decent, if a tad bland. The aging has transformed this into a fantastic beer. A dark brownish-red hue, very little head, some lacing. Very strong bourbon aroma at first that subsides about halfway though the glass. The thing I like most about this beer, aside from the wonderful aroma, is the nearly instantaneous finish. There is no aftertaste to taint the next sip.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 140
posted by dave in category
decent,
porter
This beer is occasionally decent, but usually it's way too bland or way too bitter. It's not worth my time or money to try it any more.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 120
posted by dave in category
good,
smoked
(draft) Stupid name, I think they've given up there. The beer was black. More than black. It was anti-light. Very little foam, as is typical for NABC beers. Not much of an aroma, just a touch of smoky malt. Fairly thick and creamy mouthfeel. Flavor is a bit sharp and smoky, surprising after the tame aroma. Finish is creamy smoke. I liked it, so odds are good that they'll never make it again.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 40
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
bourbon,
good,
stout
The Bourbondaddy is a stout aged in a used bourbon barrel. I had this last year at about this time, and I remember liking it, but I don't remember much else about it. This time around I actually paid attention to what I was drinking. It's a little bitter at first, but after that it's very good. Nothing extremely special, it tastes the way it should - a medium stout with a little bourbon flavor added.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 30
posted by dave in category
brown,
decent
Pretty bland unless it's the first beer of the night. I remain sad that Rich O's pulled Newcastle in favor of this one.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 220
posted by dave in category
smoked,
yummy
This beer has gone through a few different incarnations, all leading up to this, what may be the ultimate smoked ale. The first couple of sips are bitter, but that fades quickly and all that's left is yumminess. I really wish that this were available more often.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 1916
posted by dave in category
ipa,
swill
(draft) Just had a small sample of this, as IPA is probably my least favorite style. This didn't taste too bad until I swallowed it, then the hoppiness made itself known. A pretty heavy beer, one that I probably won't bother having again.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
good,
stout
(draft) First time drinking the non-bourbonized version of this stout. I got an almost overpowering sense of chocolate - both in the aroma and the flavor. Pretty good, but would probably be too much for me to wrap an evening around. I was pleased to detect no coffee or licorice at all.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 40
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
stout,
yummy
(draft) Black with a decent tan head which completely disappeared within one minute.. Strong aroma of roasted malt and a touch of chocoloate. Flavor is like the aroma. Mostly roasted malt with a touch of chocolate. And no hop bitterness! Yay! I really like this beer, so I'l probably never see it again once this batch is gone. I'd better drink up while I can.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 90
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
good,
rye
(draft) Dirty gold. Zero fizz. Has a sweet aroma, if that makes any sense. Flavor is quite sweet with some odd undescribable undertones. Pretty good, but dangerous because the alcohol is very well hidden.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 80
posted by dave in category
lager,
swill
(draft) I'd never call myself a pilsner fan, so I didn't have great expectations for this beer. Having said that, this just wasn't very good. A little citrusy, and a little bit of some odd flavor that I cannot pin down. Must be the corn. Hey, at least I tried it.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
decent
(draft) I didn't expect to like this beer, and I guess I was right. It wasn't too bad though. Besides the expected bitter finish, the main thing that I noticed was the almost buttery mouthfeel. Not a great description, but I only had the one sample glass.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
decent
The only word I can think of to describe it is "cloying." There didn't seem to be much of a distinct flavor, but what there was lingered for quite a while.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
swill
(draft) I don't know why breweries try to make this kind of beer. It's really quite disgusting.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(draft) Cloudy brown. No foam (duh). Aroma of sugar and unidentifiable spices. Flavor is decent - reminds me of pumpkins. There's a slight citrus tang at the finish.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
smoked,
yummy
I'm Combining my descriptions here. See the entry for Cone Smoker.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 840
posted by dave in category
yummy
(draft) Dark and sweet. There was a slight bitterness to the finish that made me want to take another sip right away. The description says molasses, but I didn't get any of that. I got more of a fruity flavor that might have been plums or cherries. A very pleasant surprise was that it's not that strong (7% ABV). A very good beer that I will probably drink until it's gone.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 230
posted by dave in category
swill
(draft) No matter how hard I try, I cannot detect any aroma or flavor. All I get is a slightly drying finish.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 8
posted by dave in category
belgian,
brown,
good
They're calling it a "Belgian Brown Ale" but I don't really know what that means so I'll call it "Newcastle with Apples in it." It was okay, and the apple undertones weren't that strong. I liked it.
Update 080605: Yes, I know what a Belgian is now. I'd like to see this beer return.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
good,
porter
What a scary beer! It tastes very good, with no bitternes at all, and just the right amount of carbonation. The scary part is that it's over 8% alcohol, and that'll sneak up on you real quick if you're not careful.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 60
posted by dave in category
decent,
esb
(cask) I guess I was expecting something bitter. You know, because of the name of the beer. This wasn't bitter at all. The aroma was malty and a little flowery. My first impression of the flavor was that it was watery. That watery impression did fade by the time I finished the glass. This beer is very easy to drink. Not my favorite though.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
decent,
weird
(draft) Dark gold. There's an unidentifiable (by me at least) aroma and flavor, both reminiscent of evergreen shrubbery. The finish is drying and long-lasting. It kind of reminds me of when I was a kid and I'd chew on Sassafras leaves. The finish is the most notable characteristic. A decent beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 23
posted by dave in category
swill
(draft) Looked and smelled fantastic - good enough that I pushed past my initial dislike of the taste to give it a fair shot. Eventually the bitterness wore me out, and I ended up giving about half the pint away. I can understand the appeal of this beer, it just doesn't happen to appeal to me.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
good,
stout
(draft) As with all Imperial Stouts, this one took a few sips before my palate was numbed enough to appreciate it. A little more subdued than I was expeciting, absolutely drinkable. The alcohol was masked very well.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
belgian,
good,
rye,
wheat
(draft) I've gone ahead and updated this rating as this beer has become one of my favorites. Very little head, and the beer is a little flat. But the rye and honey play together quite nicely. One of the few semi-strong beers that I can get my swill-drinking friends to drink.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 340
posted by dave in category
brown,
good
(draft) Very well-balanced ale, probably meant to be a copy of Newcastle Brown Ale, and it is a very good copy indeed. A little more malt than the Newcastle. A very good session beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 587
posted by dave in category
good,
stout
(draft) Very smooth for so much alcohol. I really liked this, but I'd probably like it even more without the oaky undertones. Almost black with good head and lacing. There were subtle hints of vanilla and bourbon that were a very pleasant surprise.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 70
posted by dave in category
decent,
stout
(draft) Recommended by the bartender. I didn't really give this beer a fair tasting. It was very roasty, and tasted a little burnt to me. Past experience tells me that if I'd finished the glass I'd probably have liked it better by then. I'll attempt to have this again someday.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
brown,
davefest,
yummy
Newcastle is one of those beers that tastes good from the first sip of the first glass to the last drop of the third glass. It's as steady as a rock. Not as flavorful as some of the beers I've been drinking recently, but it's extremely well-balanced, and with only 5% or so ABV, it makes a very good session beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5930
posted by dave in category
belgian,
swill
(draft) Dark cranberry in color. Huge head. Aroma is a very faint sweetness. Tastes like watery cranberry juice. Kind of disgusting.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 14
posted by dave in category
belgian,
yummy
(bottle) Hazy dark brown. Minimal head. fantastic aroma of malt and raisins. Fairly intense malt flavor. Apples and raisins predominate. Fucking yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 75
posted by dave in category
stout,
yummy
(draft) A wonderful beer. Intensity everywhere from the aroma to
the flavor to the finish. Dark chocolate and quite a lot of roasted malt. A sweet burning finsh that made me want another sip right away.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 44
posted by dave in category
good
(draft) A very pretty beer, hazy orange with a nice creamy head. The taste was a little sour, but in a good way. It reminded me of a good lambic more than anything else.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 30
posted by dave in category
good,
saison
(draft) Got kind of an odd aroma along with the expected apple. Maybe cherries. Flavor did seem to have the same bit of oddness. It was good though.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 15
posted by dave in category
good,
porter,
smoked
(bottle) Almost black with a decent tan head that faded quickly. Aroma is mild smoke and chocolate. Flavor is mostly mild smoke flavor. I really like this because there's noting competing with the smoke. Pretty damn good. My second-favorite smoked porter.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 72
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(bottle) Dark ruby-colored, firm head. Nice but shot-lived head. Strong aroma of various dark fruits. Flavor milder than the aroma indicates. A little drying and fizzy. Not bad at all.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 25
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
Dark copper-colored, firm head. A neutral flavor, with perhaps a touch of apple and more hops than I usually prefer. A very fizzy mouthfeel. A good beer. The aroma was a little perfumy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 40
posted by dave in category
good
It was quite disgusting at first, but after an inch or so it started to taste pretty good. I suspect that my initial disgust was caused by the ESB still coating my mouth. At 8.5% it was too strong for me to risk getting a second opinion.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(bottle) Huge head, bordering on the ridiculous. Taste, as I expected, was that of a fairly mild Belgian. A little less sweet and a little more hoppy than I'd generally prefer, but a very good beer anyway.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
decent,
lager
(bottle) Not as bad as I remember from the sips I took as a kid. Pretty bland, with just a touch of citrus.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 42
posted by dave in category
good,
wheat
(draft) Pretty standard German hefeweizen in appearance and aroma and flavor. Just a touch of sourness at the finish that wasn't too bad. I liked this much more than I expected to.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 85
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(bottle) Does weird necessarily equal good? If so, then this is a
very good beer. Very sour in both aroma and flavor. Supposedly oak-aged and stuff but I couldn't detect anything beyond the sourness. Fairly decent, but I cannot imagine ever having more than a single small glass.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
lager,
swill
(draft) Good head. The color of very pale piss. Aroma is very slight, and of hops. Probably the palest, definitely the most watery, beer I've ever had. I'm rating this as swill only because it's so inoffensive. Otherwise it would get a rating of piss.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(draft) Citrusy aroma. Light apple flavor, with maybe a little apricot? No finish at all. Decent, but the apricot turned me off a little.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 24
posted by dave in category
decent,
lager
(draft) Dark Lager, almost black. A light coffee flavor. Fairly thick mouthfeel with some lagery fizz at the end. Not too bad, but not great.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 24
posted by dave in category
decent
(draft) I've rated this right down the middle in every category. Nothing at all stands out. I don't like the style, so I don't like the beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
swill
(draft) Very light and citrusy. Tasted like a Bud Light to me. Supposedly an ale but I'm not convinced.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
swill
(draft) An otherwise bland vehicle for a bitter hoppy aftertaste. What's the point?
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
lager,
swill
(draft) Citrusy piss. I recall having this a long time ago and somewhat enjoying it, but my last attempt caused me to swear that I'll never let this touch my lips again.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 24
posted by dave in category
belgian,
davefest,
yummy
(draft) Nice and thick with very good lacing. A slightly different apple taste than I've had with other Belgians - maybe some caramel in there too? A very good beer that would probably kill me if I had more than two.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 206
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(draft) I see all these descriptions about sharp and hoppy and peppery - I got none of that. What I got was a pale beer with a huge head that didn't have much of anything in the way of aroma or flavor. What there was, however, was quite good. At 7.5%, this beer is a lot stronger than it tastes or smells.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 30
posted by dave in category
swill,
wheat
(draft) The color of dirty piss. A decent head and good lacing. Aroma of orange peels. Thin and citrusy falvor and mouthfeel. A touch of grapefruit bitterness at the end. Quite disgusting.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
good
(draft) Dark cola in color. decent head and lacing. Nice and smooth. More complex than the first few sips indicate. Spices and hops and nutmeg and molasses are what I think I detected. A good beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 60
posted by dave in category
brown,
favorite,
scotch,
yummy
Had this on tap at a bar with the same name in Las Vegas. By the end of the week I knew I'd found my new favorite non-smoked beer. Perfectly balanced sweetness and bitterness, and also with a little touch of something special in the base flavor. Very tough to describe though.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 720
posted by dave in category
decent,
porter
I'm sure it had some flavor and some characteristics, but I just couldn't detect anything after the stronger beer I'd just had. I'll be sure to give this a fair sampling when it returns to Rich O's.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
decent
(draft) The color of piss. No foam whatsoever. Flavor and aroma of malt and hops. Very mild and understated. Not worth my time.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
brown,
decent
(draft) Clear dark copper in color. Decent head. Aroma of nothing much. Ditto for flavor. Barely decent.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
belgian,
brown,
good
(draft) Very good. Cloudy brown color, little head to speak of. Taste of apples that have almost gone sour. There were a couple of other, more subtle flavors. Maybe raisins and honey. I wanted more right away.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 30
posted by dave in category
barleywine,
belgian,
good
(draft) Clear dark copper-colored. Decent head and lacing. A dry fruit aroma and flavor. The alcohol is hidden very well. Pretty damn good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(draft) The color of weird cloudy brass. Huge heaping head. Aroma of stale hops and apples and cheap perfume. Flavor of stale and cheap perfume. Long bitter finish. Just barely decent, once my taste buds had been sufficiently numbed.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
piss
Somehow combined bland and rotten in the same glass. Tasted like fermented Mazola Corn Oil, and not in a good way. Blech.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
decent,
porter,
stout
(draft) Very dark ruby-colored. No aroma. Nice head. A pretty thick mouthfeel, with coffee and licorice fairly well-balanced. Decent, but not worth my time.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
decent,
porter
(draft) Probably the blandest selection that Rich O's Saturnalia has to offer. A bit of a chocolate smell and taste that's followed up by a very watery finish. Decent but not memorable at all.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
swill
(draft) Take a bland IPA, and wash your socks in it. Then take it to your local steel mill, and use the same beer to wash the socks of everyone who works there. This just might give you a good idea of what this beer tastes and smells like. Actually, it would taste and smell better than the beer does, but I didn't want to go overboard with my description.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 22
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(bottle) Fizzy cola-colored. Decent head. Same aroma as the "6" but much more pronounced. Flavor of dried apples and plums and cola. Pretty damn good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 11
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(bottle) Fizzy dark brown. Huge head. Aroma and flavor of dried apples and raisins. Not much to it. Decent.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 11
posted by dave in category
brown,
good
(draft) More malty than sweet, so a little unbalanced. Good head and lacing. Pretty good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
brown,
good
(draft) Stupid name. Very dark brown - almost black, with a nice tan head. Very roasty and malty. Not sure that this should be called a brown ale, but whatever you want to call it, it's still good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16)
posted by dave in category
porter,
swill
(draft) No aroma. Very faint coffee flavor. Very fizzy mouthfeel. Not very good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
brown,
decent
(draft) Smelled pretty good. The flavor and mouthfeel brought creamy bananas to mind. A pretty strange beer, but decent.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
saison,
yummy
(draft) Clear gold in color. Looks like a lager, so scary. The flavor is awesome. There are the typical apple undertones, but this is a lot thicker-tasting than most saisons I've had. Damn good. Yummy actually.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
alt,
decent
(draft) Looks and tastes like weak tea, but with the slightest hint of creamy caramel. Not too bad. If a beer like this is too much for you then you probably shouldn't be drinking beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
brown,
decent
(draft) Aroma and flavor of slightly sweetened iced tea. Nothing notable about this beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
good,
wheat
(draft) No detectable aroma, and not much flavor. I can't tell if this is an American or a German wheat. It's very bland, but still good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
good,
wheat
(draft) I'm convinced that this is the same beer that Hofbrauhaus is selling. Quite a good beer in a style that I don't normally care for.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
decent
(draft) Much blander than I was expecting. Just a beer, neither great nor horrible.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
smoked,
swill
There wasn't very much smoke, and what there was was the "grapey" kind of smoke that I don't really care for. To make matters worse, there was no bitterness, only sweetness behind the smoke, and those two flavors clashed quite a bit.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
alt,
ipa,
swill
(draft) Looks like a brown ale, smells like an alt, but tastes like an IPA. Bitter flavor followed with a bitter finish. An Altbier is supposed to be balanced, dammit! A very disappointing beer from one of my favorite breweries.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
decent,
weird
(bottle) Very faint peppery aroma, with a little smoke thrown in. Not much taste until the finish, then a little pepper heat. I was expecting more pepper, so I was expecting to dislike this more than I did.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 42
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
davefest,
favorite,
stout,
yummy
(draft) A fantastic beer, from the intense chocolate syrup aroma through the creamy mouthfeel to the delicious finish. Beyond yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 1576
posted by dave in category
brown,
good
(draft) Cloudy brown. This was a mild tasting ale that went down quite good and didn't seem too high in alcohol. A German Maibock, which I never would have guessed. Tastes like a Scotch Ale to me. Good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 368
posted by dave in category
good,
saison
(draft) Poured dirty orange. Aroma was musty - reminded me of a lambic. Taste also reminded me of a lambic, except this wasn't particularly sour. There was quite a bit of complication behind the obvious mustiness of the aroma and the flavor. I liked this beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 40
posted by dave in category
brown,
swill,
weird
(draft) Very dark brown. Huge heaping head. Bitter aroma and bitter flavor. Quite disgusting.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 1
posted by dave in category
brown,
good
(draft) Very dark brown. Malty aroma and flavor. I liked this a lot.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 115
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
swill
(draft) I just had a small sample glass of this, as I was not expecting to like it. I was right. Very watery tasting, but sort of a thick mouthfeel. Hard to believe that this comes from Rogue.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
good,
porter
(draft) Pretty good. This reminded me of Bell's Kalamazoo Stout more than anything else. A slight slant toward the coffee side of the flavor spectrum as opposed to the chocolate side. The fairly high ABV is very well hidden.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 70
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
stout,
yummy
(bottle) Hard to find anything wrong with this beer. If I had to pick something it would be the high ABV which limits the amount that can be consumed. A yummy chocolately flavor with a fairly intense alcohol burn. Quite good, and I will be buying more bottles which I will try to let age.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 82
posted by dave in category
brown,
good
(draft) Dark amber. Decent head. Malty and hoppy aroma. Malty and hoppy flavor. Pretty fucking good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
good
(draft) Very dark cherry revealed when held up to the light. A lot of complexity, but most of I think wasted as nothing stood out at all. I did think I got a little cherry at first but even that subsided by the second or third sip. Good, but not very memorable.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
decent
I tasted malt, malt, and more malt. It wasn't particularly bad, it just wasn't particularly good either.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
good,
stout
Pretty good. Quite roasty. Maybe a little bit too roasty - it was hard to find anything else.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 40
posted by dave in category
davefest,
smoked,
yummy
(draft) It was a good beer, not nearly as smoky as I'd been hoping, but the smoke flavor and aroma was still pretty apparent. It had a less wide-ranging and complex flavor than the Cone Smoker I get when I'm back home, but sometimes simpler is better. A little subdued. Quite yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 968
posted by dave in category
good,
stout
(bottle) Came highly recommended. I was looking for something chocolately, and I guess this fit that bill. I have to say that it didn't live up to its aroma though. A sublt mix of chocolate and coffee flavor. A slight bitter finish. Quite good, but not great.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
good
(draft) Dark bronze. Very light foam. A strong aroma of whatzit and orange. The flavor was mostly whatzit, with some light orange peel thrown in. Despite the citrus, I did like this beer. I just wish I knew what the whatzit really was.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 40
posted by dave in category
swill,
wheat
It's always a crap shoot as to whether a hefeweizen is in the true German style or the crappy American style. This was American, so I didn't like it. As with most beers, however, this did get better as the glass got emptier. By the end, it was passable. This is not the beer's fault - I just don't like the style.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
good,
scotch
More malty than other Scotch Ales I've tried, and that extra maltiness was needed to help mask the alcohol. A very good beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
yummy
(draft) A very nice surprise. Dark clear amber. Minimal head. No detectable aroma. The yummy malty and fruity flavor came out of nowhere. There are supposed to be citrus adjuncts but I couldn't detect them at all.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
decent
(draft) Tried some the other night and wasn't impressed. Had a full glass tonight and still wasn't impressed, but it certainly went down easier. For all the hops and malts used, I should have detected more complexity. Just a decent beer that does a very good job of hiding its high ABV.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 13
posted by dave in category
decent,
wheat
(draft) Good, but not as good as everyone else seems to think. Nothing noteworthy at all. I'd describe some details but there really aren't any. It's just a beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 24
posted by dave in category
decent,
wheat
(draft) Not my favorite in this style, but not really anything wrong with it that I can point out. Just a little subdued in every aspect. Could use something more, but I'm not sure what.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 60
posted by dave in category
good,
wheat
(bottle) Cloudy gold. A good fizzy head. Strong German wheat aroma, and flavor, with just a hint of tangy sourness. Pretty damn good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 17
posted by dave in category
decent
(draft) Thick but fairly mild. Not sure what I was expecting, but this wasn't it. I got a little coffee flavor and a little butterscotch. No aftertaste at all.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
decent,
ipa
(draft) One of the better IPAs, but that's not saying too much for someone like me that doesn't like the style. Just decent, nothing more. Not bitter but a little sour.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
decent,
porter
(bottle) I've never been a big fan of this brewery, and this beer did nothing to change that. A decent coffee flavored porter with the typical Sierra Nevada lagerish finish. It got better the more I drank, but it never quite reached the point of being good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
lager,
piss
(draft) A lager by any other name is still a lager, and I still don't like it. Kind of a sickly-sweet taste that I can't really describe and I don't want to drink more of it just to get a better description.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
good,
porter
(bottle) Highly recommended to me by a coffe lover, so I was expecting coffee flavor to the beer. This instead has a good chocolate base to the flavor. A little extra bite at the end, because of the 7.2 ABV, that I could have done without. Good though.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
brown,
good
A sampling of this beer was intriguing enough for me to order a full glass. There was a slight watery taste that at first turned me off, but after a few sips I started to imagine, believe it or not, a slight peaty characteristic to the water. This has since become one of my favorite session beers. Nice and mild, and low enough in alcohol that I could drink it all night.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 1654
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
good,
porter
(draft) With a name like Smuttynose, it has to be good, right? Right. A very strong chocolate aroma and flavor. Like the NABC Haggisdaddy Stout it reminded me of, this would probably be good poured over ice cream
Website
Ounces Consumed: 21
posted by dave in category
lager,
swill
I asked some regulars what was the wimpiest beer at Rich O's and was told it was Spaten Lager. I had one of these to field-test it for my sister and it was indeed wimpy. I wish I could think of a better descriptor.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 23
posted by dave in category
ipa,
swill,
wheat
(draft) Clear light amber. Good mound of foam. Smells and tastes like hops and alcohol. Kinda gross, but some people will probably like it.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
davefest,
good,
lager,
smoked
(draft) Amber in color, with a slightly sweet smoke aroma. Much lighter in smoke than other rauchbiers. Very good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 1518
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(draft) If you've ever wondered what a mixture of Delirium Tremens and New Belgium Fat Tire would be like, then this is the beer for you. I liked it.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent,
wheat
(draft) Touted as being "like Blue Moon" and I suppose that's not too much of a lie. A decent Belgian wheat, but with lagerish undertones and a touch too much citrus. Kind of a blend of Belgian and American wheats.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
good,
wheat
The aroma is fantastic, as is the flavor. Maybe a bit more mellow than other German-style wheats. A very good beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 26
posted by dave in category
swill
Hoppy and malty, with a bitter finish. Common is a very good name for this beer - there are a zillion just like it, and I don't like any of them.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 2
posted by dave in category
brown,
good
Pretty good. Malty with a hint of cola to balance it out. A lot like Goose Island Hex Nut Brown Ale.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 6
posted by dave in category
good,
stout
A typical dry stout. Nothing wrong with it at all but nothing great either. Quite roasty, and better than average I suppose.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 6
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(draft) One of those beers that takes a long time to pour. Once in a glass, the head faded fairly quickly. I detected a strong oak smell until the head had gone, then lots of malt and alcohol with some fruit. The alcohol-bitter aftertaste reminded me strongly of bourbon. I liked this, but I'd recommend it to close out a session instead of beginning one.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 30
posted by dave in category
lager,
piss
(draft) I asked for a Belgian and got this awful thing. I don't like lagers, and this was a pretty bad lager. Bland mixed with boring.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 2
posted by dave in category
good,
stout
(draft) First off, looks fantastic. Black with a firm brown head, I was almost reluctant to drink it for fear of messing up the head. Flavor is a nice chocolate, with just a hint of bitterness about halfway through. I was a little surprised, and a little disappointed, that the ABV is so high on this one. I'd love to be able to have more than one.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 94
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
belgian,
yummy
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
good,
porter,
smoked
It was pretty good beer actually, not as strong of a smoke flavor as some of the other smoked porters I've had, but enough to be recognizable, and enough to be pretty good. I'll call it "smoked porter light."
Website
Ounces Consumed: 470
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(bottle) Hazy black color, decent head that faded quickly. Smells fantastic, with dark fruits and maybe even some chocolate. Flavor is fruity and creamy. There's a lingering bitter finish that I don't care for at all. A decent beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 25
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
good
(draft) had a decent flavor, but there wasn't much flavor to it. I kept getting hints of spices and such, but the hints faded as soon as I started to detect them. Good, but not great.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
alt,
decent
(draft) A decent, but not great, alt beer. Balance favored the hoppy side, especially in the aftertaste. Looked and smelled great, but the taste was a little disappointing.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(bottle) Reminded me of a winter seasonal. Lots of fruit that I cannot quite define. Thick and strong, yet refreshing at the same time. I really wish I could drink more than one.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(draft) Cloudy dark urine in appearance. No head to speak of. A very citrusy aroma, but the flavor was quite similar to a German wheat except for the thinner mouthfeel. A decent beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
belgian,
fruit,
yummy
(draft) Cloudy yellow/orange. A nice head that faded quickly. This is a very citrusy Belgian when it first enters the mouth, but then the pumpkin takes over and coats the mouth with sweetness, then there were some nice spices in the finish. Just yummy. It seemed like it had a high ABV, but its 10.5% still surprised me.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 30
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(draft) Looked like coffee with cream, I guess because the keg had been jiggled. Flavor was pretty good. Lots of berries and fruits. A fairly strong alcohol bite at the finish.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
belgian,
weird,
yummy
(draft) Kind of funky aroma, which was to be expected I suppose. A mild mustardy flavor, just a slight spiciness. Much much better than I'd expected. I will have more of this, definitely.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 229
posted by dave in category
brown,
decent
(draft) Good lacing. No detectable aroma, flavor, or aftertaste. There was just a hint of bitterness that faded before swallowing was complete. Not bad, but very boring.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
brown,
decent
(draft) Cloudy brown, with a nice long-lasting head. The taste was malty and nutty, with a fairly bitter finish that became more tolerable as the glass became emptier.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 40
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
decent,
porter
(draft) Of all the beers at Rich O's, this one is perhaps the one that's been recommended to me most often. Frankly, I don't understand all the hype. It is a good beer, but not a great one. I think my main problem was the gritty feeling I got in my mouth while drinking it. It almost seemed like there was something that hadn't quite dissolved all the way. By the end of the glass it was better. Other than the gritty mouthfeel, this beer smelled and looked fantastic, and it had a really good flavor - one that wasn't nearly as sweet as I was expecting. A very drinkable beer, but any place that has this probably has something better as well.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
brown,
decent
(draft) My first beer in this style. I didn't detect too much of anything except a trace of bitter aftertaste. The beer was very drinkable and would make a good session beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 30
posted by dave in category
good,
scotch
(draft) A nice dark brown color that revealed red when help up to light. I thought the taste was very good, though there seemed to be a slight gritty feel until the head had dissipated. The slightly bitter finish made me want to drink again to get back to the nice flavor. Not recommended on an empty stomach, as I wanted another pint but had to decline.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 160
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
decent
(bottle) Quite an interesting beer. Very complex, with flavors I don't think I've ever encountered before. The stuff was good, though perhaps just a little too fruity for me to say I really liked it. I will have it again sometime though.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 50
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(draft) Had a head that lasted forever. Quite a bit blander than other Belgians I've enjoyed - this had a more lagerish taste to it, and no apple taste at all. Despite that I did like it though.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 30
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
porter,
yummy
(draft) That first taste nearly overpowered me. I still can't believe that this beer comes from a brewpub catering to the flavor-impaired masses. Very chocolately, very roasty, very delicious. One of the best porters I've ever had.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 153
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
decent
(draft) Not as disgusting as it sounds. It tastes like Hawaiian Punch. this might be good with the blackened mahi-mahi with pineapple sauce they have on their food menu.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 5
posted by dave in category
good,
rye
(draft) Dark brown with just a hint of red. Has just a slight bit of that unmistakeable rye finish. Mostly malt behind it, without much bitterness at all. I really liked this. Its 7% ABV surprised me.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
brown,
davefest,
yummy
I have to say that despite the long-winded name this is one of he best beers I've had in a long time. Smooth, not too strong, not too weak. What an excellent session beer! I wish I could describe it more clearly. "Drinkable" is the word that comes to mind most often. Malty and complex. Neither too sweet nor too bitter. Yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 290
posted by dave in category
piss
I didn't like it at all, and I don't think I can properly describe the displeasure I had while drinking it, so I won't try. A sickly-sweet syrupy mess.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 6
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(bottle) Cloudy brown, huge heaping head. A constant stream of bubbles kept emerging form the dark depths of the glass. Smells like foam. A fairly mild flavor of dried apples and raisins. A little musty. Good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 25
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good,
wheat
(bottle) Although supposedly a Belgian wheat, this had much of the aroma and flavor of a German wheat. If I had to put a label on it, I'd say that is was a blend of those two excellent styles. A very good beer from what is becoming one of my favorite breweries.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(bottle) Hazy cola-colored. Massive head, mild fruity aroma. Mild fruity and fizzy flavor, with some hoppy dryness that didn't exactly thrill me. It got better as the bottle got emptier.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 25
posted by dave in category
belgian,
wheat,
yummy
(bottle) Hazy light amber in color. Huge head. Fantastic aroma of apple peels and bananas and cherries. A strong Belgian wheat flavor. More sharp and tangy than most. Think Blue Moon on steroids. Yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 25
posted by dave in category
belgian,
yummy
(bottle) Cloudy yellow, with a decent amount of foam. Aroma of wheat and malt and a touch of oak. Flavor quite similar to Belgian wheat ales. Goes down very easily, the alcohol is very well hidden. Yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 45
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(bottle) Very dark, almost black. A smallish head that faded almost instantly. It had a very dry aroma and flavor. More like wood than the fruit I'd been expecting. A very good beer though. It certainly didn't taste like it was 10.5% ABV.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
belgian,
brown,
yummy
(draft) Quite yummy actually. This surprised me until I remember that the same brewer makes La Fin Du Monde. If I had to describe this, and I guess I do, I'd call it Newcastle on steroids.Dark amber. Nice head. Sweet and malty aroma and flavor. I want more right now please.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 35
posted by dave in category
belgian,
yummy
(bottle) Black, revealing amber only when strongly backlit. Huge creamy head. Aroma of oak and malty apples and cherries. Flavor is like the aroma, only better. There's something else there, maybe grapes of all things. Pretty damn yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 25
posted by dave in category
swill
(draft) Hazy reddish amber. No head to speak of. Aroma of stale hops and malt. What little flavor there was, was disgusting. I had to really force myself to finish the glass.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
good,
porter
(draft) Had a very strong roasted malt aroma. The flavor was quite nice with roasted malt and a mild chocolate. A dry finish that made me want to take another drink right away.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 42
posted by dave in category
brown,
decent
(draft) My first impression was that this beer was simply a relabeled Smithwick's. After a bit, however, I did begin to notice a slight hint of bitterness. More like a hint of a hint actually. Smithwick's is better.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
stout,
yummy
(draft) Incredible head and lacing. Had a strong coffee aroma but the flavor was an incredible blend of both coffee and chocolate. Very creamy and very yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 406
posted by dave in category
good,
wheat
(draft) Very fizzy but sweet. A mild banana aroma and flavor. Mouthfeel was fizzy wheat. There was a slight tartness to the finish. I liked this, but I've had better.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 12
posted by dave in category
decent,
wheat
(draft) Very fizzy. Too damn fizzy. There was too much citrus and it was a little sour tasting. In other words, it's an American wheat beer. It's sole purpose may be for those nights when I don't really feel like drinking beer.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 53
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
yummy
(draft) It reminds me of the Great Lakes Christmas Ale that I enjoyed so much a few months ago. There was some fruitiness that I will call raspberry and some nutmeg as well. My only real problem with this beer is that it's rather strong and I cannot safely have more than one.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 220
posted by dave in category
good,
scotch
(draft) This was my first scotch ale, and I guess it was a little blander than I expected. I did really like it though.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(draft) This beer is evil. Pure evil. To taste the way it does, which is actually fairly mild, but to pack that much alcohol - well like I said it's evil. As I said, a fairly mild (and fairly standard) Belgian taste. A slight alcohol finish is the only thing that hints at the wolf underneath this sheep's clothing.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 92
posted by dave in category
decent,
porter
(bottle) Very malty and sweet. There might have been some chocolate and/or coffee flavor under all that malt, but I couldn't be sure. Mouthfeel was creamy and sticky. Finished like it had a higher ABV than it really did.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 17
posted by dave in category
decent,
esb
(draft) One of my favorites from a style that is not a favorite. Not too bitter. A touch of citrus that wasn't too bad.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
piss
(bottle) Absolutely disgusting aroma and color and flavor. Probably the worst beer I've ever tried.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 1
posted by dave in category
davefest,
wheat,
yummy
(bottle) Readily available in bottled form, an availability that I take advantage of quite often. Fantastic aroma and flavor. Low enough ABV to drink several of them in one sitting, and that's another thing I take advantage of. Incredibly yummy.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 1949
posted by dave in category
good,
wheat
(draft) Took a long time to drink - it's pretty filling. Very nice aroma and a good flavor. This beer has convinced me that I now like hefeweissbiers - though I like the non-dunkel version a lot more. Seemed to affect me more than its 5.3% alcohol would suggest.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 80
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(bottle) Cloudy dark brown. Minimal head. Aroma of malt and cola. Flavor more of the same. A bit of a musty taste at first that grew on me. Not a lot of fruit in the flavor, just malt and cola. Pretty damn good.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 11
posted by dave in category
belgian,
good
(draft) Hazy light orange. Good long-lasting head. Aroma of apples and citrus and wheat. Flavor is light and fruity - a bit like a Belgian wheat. Just the slightest hint of alcohol burn at the finish.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 25
posted by dave in category
brown,
decent
(draft) No head at all, but somehow managed to have very good lacing. A hint of caramel in the flavor. A slightly lagerish finish but not too fizzy. Not bad at all.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 10
posted by dave in category
decent,
wheat
>(draft) The bartender didn't know if this was an American or German wheat, so I had a pint to find out. What it is is a very weak American wheat. Very little aroma or flavor. Since I don't like American wheats, this one was actually very tolerable.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 16
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent,
wheat
(draft) Looks like grapefruit juice. Smells pretty good, kind of like a blend of Belgian and German wheat styles. Flavor was more of the same. Nothing wrong with this beer at all, but nothing really right about it either.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 4
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
belgian,
yummy
(bottle) Wow. I wasn't expecting a beer this special. The label says "Belgian Ale Brewed with Juniper Berries." There's not a whole lot that I can add to that description, but I owe it more. Flat-out yummy. I want more.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 175
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
bourbon,
good
(draft) Clear bronze. A very interesting vanilla and smoke aroma. Despite the name, there wasn't even the tiniest hint of bourbon. A nice medium mouthfeel, with vanilla and light smoke in the flavor as well. Pretty fucking good. I don't care who makes it.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 100
posted by dave in category
chocolate,
good,
stout
(draft) Good head, good lacing. Subtle chocolate aroma and more subtle chocolate flavor. Nothing else to distinguish it at all. It did kind of grow on me though.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 420
posted by dave in category
adjuncts,
decent
(draft) I was expecting more from this beer for some reason, but I should have known better. This is, after all, the brewery that touts their chocolate stout as "double" chocolate even though it's clearly the weakest of any that I've ever had. But enough ranting. A decent brown ale with a touch of something that I couldn't identify - there's not enough of whatever it is.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 20
posted by dave in category
belgian,
decent
(bottle) The aroma was almost overpowering at first, but after that it was hard to even detect. The flavor was mild and tasty. It was kind of strange to pull a cork on a bottle of beer and find something this generic inside. Good, but not great.
Website
Ounces Consumed: 25